// question: 0 name: Switch category to $module$/Default for Step 3.6 Calculating vaccine efficacy and herd immunity threshold - Quiz $CATEGORY: $module$/Default for Step 3.6 Calculating vaccine efficacy and herd immunity threshold - Quiz // question: 282 name: Q1 Assume that Ebola has a basic case reproduction number (R0) of 2. ::Q1 Assume that Ebola has a basic case reproduction number (R0) of 2.::[html]
Assume that Ebola has a basic case reproduction number (R0) of 2. What percentage of the population must be immune in order to reach the herd immunity threshold?
{ ~67%
#Remember the formula for herd immunity threshold\:
\nHerd immunity threshold \= (R0-1)/R0
\nYou may find 3.5 How would vaccines help? useful.
=50%
#The formula for herd immunity threshold \= (R0-1)/R0. As such, in this case herd immunity threshold\: (2-1)/2\= 0.50 \= 50%
~33%
#Remember the formula for herd immunity threshold\:
\nHerd immunity threshold \= (R0-1)/R0
\nYou may find 3.5 How would vaccines help? useful.
} // question: 283 name: Q2 Vaccines are not 100% effective. ::Q2 Vaccines are not 100% effective.::[html]Vaccines are not 100% effective. The percentage of the population that needs to be vaccinated to reach the herd immunity threshold (the vaccine coverage) depends on the vaccine efficacy.
\nAssume a vaccine for Ebola is available with an efficacy of 75%, and that the R0 for Ebola is 2 (as in the previous example).
\nWhat proportion of individuals must be vaccinated in order to reach the herd immunity threshold? (Hint\: the HIT has already been calculated and is 50%.)
{ =67%
#Required vaccine coverage \= herd immunity threshold / vaccine efficacy. Therefore, the proportion that would need to be vaccinated to get R\=1 \= 50% / 75% \= 0.667 or 67%.
~50%
#Remember that the required vaccine coverage \= herd immunity threshold / vaccine efficacy.
\nYou may find 3.5 How would vaccines help? useful.
~33%
#Remember that the required vaccine coverage \= herd immunity threshold / vaccine efficacy.
\nYou may find 3.5 How would vaccines help? useful.
} // question: 289 name: Q3 If the R0 for Ebola was 1.3 rather than 2 (e.g. in a totally susceptible population where procedures ::Q3 If the R0 for Ebola was 1.3 rather than 2 (e.g. in a totally susceptible population where procedures::[html]If the R0 for Ebola was 1.3 rather than 2 (e.g. in a totally susceptible population where procedures for contact tracing and isolation were already in place), which of the following is true, compared to the scenario in Q2
{ ~You would need to vaccinate more people to reach the herd immunity threshold.
#Remember the herd immunity threshold is R0-1/R0. If the herd immunity threshold is lower you would need to vaccinate fewer people.
\nYou may find 3.5 How would vaccines help? useful.
=For the same vaccine coverage a vaccine with lower efficacy could be used to reach the herd immunity threshold
#Remember the herd immunity threshold is R0-1/R0, so is now (1.3-1)/1.3 \= 23%. With a vaccine coverage of 67% (as in Q2) even a vaccine with quite low efficacy could be helpful.
~This would make no difference to the proportion of the population that would need to be vaccinated to reach the herd immunity threshold
#Remember the herd immunity threshold is R0-1/R0. If the herd immunity threshold is lower you would need to vaccinate fewer people.
\nYou may find 3.5 How would vaccines help? useful.
}